<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Immigration Regulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.regulators4access.ca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.regulators4access.ca</link>
	<description>regulators4access.ca</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 01:29:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>One Year Business Rule</title>
		<link>http://www.regulators4access.ca/one-year-business-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.regulators4access.ca/one-year-business-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 01:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[applicant company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bonafides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chinese companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field investigators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitigating circumstances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[requirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shell companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simplistic view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[start up company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taiwanese companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unforeseen delays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfortunate results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uscis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vehicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrong address]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regulators4access.ca/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The USCIS designed the one-year &#8216;doing business&#8217; requirement to force the applicant company to show good faith in efforts to establish itself in the US. In the 1980s many Taiwanese companies established US subsidiary &#8216;shell&#8217; companies as a vehicle to move children to the US to study and to later apply for a green card. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The USCIS designed the one-year &#8216;doing business&#8217; requirement to force the applicant company to show good faith in efforts to establish itself in the US. In the 1980s many Taiwanese companies established US subsidiary &#8216;shell&#8217; companies as a vehicle to move children to the US to study and to later apply for a green card. The USCIS established the one-year doing business rule for start-up companies to curtail this abuse.</p>
<p>Russian and PRC Chinese companies tend to follow the trail blazed by their Taiwanese predecessors. The USCIS tends to not only question Russian and PRC Chinese start-up company applications, but often sends the files to field investigators who visit the premises in the home country and the US to check the bonafides of the visa petition.<br />
<span id="more-39"></span><br />
This practice not only delays processing but also creates some unfortunate results. We have had to appeal several cases where the USCIS checked the wrong address or the manager was simply out of the office when the USCIS investigator knocked on the door.</p>
<p>Technically, the USCIS must consider mitigating circumstances when determining compliance with the one year of doing business rule. Reasonable excuses include bad luck, unforeseen delays, and the fact that some businesses take longer to establish than others. </p>
<p>The USCIS tends to take a harsh and simplistic view. If after one year there are no new employees and no trend of increasing gross sales, no visa extension will be issued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.regulators4access.ca/one-year-business-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extending working stay</title>
		<link>http://www.regulators4access.ca/extending-working-stay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.regulators4access.ca/extending-working-stay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1b status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1b visa holders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[active trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h 1b visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larger companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[necessary capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[periods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remodel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seven consecutive years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[substantial investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tangible progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[validity period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa renewals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regulators4access.ca/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Start-up company L-1A visas have an initial validity period of one year, not three years as in other L-1A situations. The L-1A manager must conduct active business and hire employees within the one-year period. Remember, L-1A managers must oversee other managers, supervisors or professionals. At a minimum, the manager must make tangible progress towards establishing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Start-up company L-1A visas have an initial validity period of one year, not three years as in other L-1A situations. The L-1A manager must conduct active business and hire employees within the one-year period. Remember, L-1A managers must oversee other managers, supervisors or professionals. At a minimum, the manager must make tangible progress towards establishing the business. At the end of the first year the L-1A visa can be extended for up to two three-year periods.</p>
<p>H-1B visa holders are limited to six consecutive years in the US. The L-1A visa holders are restricted to seven consecutive years in the US. At the end of the maximum validity period they may change to any other status than H-1B or L-1A, often El/2, or they must leave the US for at least one year before reapplying in H-1B or L-1A status.<br />
<span id="more-36"></span><br />
L-1A visa renewals become difficult unless the manager makes tangible progress in establishing an active US business. Tangible progress includes:<br />
• hiring two or three people<br />
• showing a trend of increasing gross sales<br />
• acquisition of necessary capital assets; or<br />
• construction/remodel of premises or a factory.</p>
<p>Larger companies fare better in this regard as they can say their lack of progress is due to bigger projects which take more time to launch. They can easily prove they have the capital necessary to continue the project. Small companies have more difficulty and may decide to use H-l status instead or change to H-1B status. El/2 visa will not work without active trade or a substantial investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.regulators4access.ca/extending-working-stay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporation and Regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.regulators4access.ca/corporation-and-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.regulators4access.ca/corporation-and-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eternal life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration purposes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint ventures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited liability companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent residents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sole proprietors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uscis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa petitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regulators4access.ca/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are some question that used to be asked by people who owned some big corporation company and like to open some branch in other countries, mainly US as we discuss in here. They might found it bit tricky if didn&#8217;t know some qualification or regulation related onto it. So what are the regulation and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some question that used to be asked by people who owned some big corporation company and like to open some branch in other countries, mainly US as we discuss in here. They might found it bit tricky if didn&#8217;t know some qualification or regulation related onto it.</p>
<p>So what are the regulation and terms should be consider on it? The first one is you should establish some company. No matter what visa alternative you ultimately choose you will need to establish a US company licensed to do<br />
business in a particular state. The USCIS will not consider most business oriented visa petitions unless a US company<br />
exists. Although there are reasons to establish partnerships, joint ventures or even to use individual ownership, in<br />
most cases it&#8217;s best to form a limited company or a corporation.<br />
<span id="more-34"></span><br />
The USCIS is familiar with corporations. It is not familiar with limited partnerships, complicated general partnerships, and limited liability companies. If you can help it, don&#8217;t complicate your petition.<br />
Simply put, shareholders of corporations only risk their capital in the company. Partners or sole proprietors place all their assets at risk in the event of a law suit or business failure. Limited liability companies, Sub S corporations and limited partnerships are hybrids between corporate and individual ownership.</p>
<p>The US levies estate or death tax upon the death of a US tax resident. US tax residents include some non immigrants, permanent residents and citizens. The estate tax on non immigrants and permanent residents is much higher than the estate tax on citizens. Corporations have eternal life. Individual shareholders will die but not the corporation. </p>
<p>A corporation owned by a foreign corporation doesn&#8217;t even have a shareholder that can die. If there&#8217;s no death there&#8217;s no estate tax. Using a foreign corporation to own the shares of the US corporation not only works best for most immigration purposes, but also offers the possibility of reducing estate taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.regulators4access.ca/corporation-and-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>L-Visas</title>
		<link>http://www.regulators4access.ca/l-visas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.regulators4access.ca/l-visas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliated company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american member]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[half]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint venture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parent company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point of view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shareholders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidiary company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uscis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa applicant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa applicants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa purposes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regulators4access.ca/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The L visa category includes executive, manager or specialized knowledge applicants who transfer within an international organization. To qualify for any L category the visa applicant must transfer within the same international organization. The applicant must work in a qualifying capacity (as an executive, manager or specialized knowledge employee) for a foreign member of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The L visa category includes executive, manager or specialized knowledge applicants who transfer within an international organization. To qualify for any L category the visa applicant must transfer within the same international organization. </p>
<p>The applicant must work in a qualifying capacity (as an executive, manager or specialized knowledge employee) for a foreign member of the international organization, for one of three years preceding the transfer to the American member of the international organization in the same capacity. L visa applicants file Form 1-129 and the L supplement with the USCIS.<br />
<span id="more-30"></span><br />
To qualify as an international organization the parent company must establish a branch office, subsidiary company or affiliate company in the US. From an immigration point of view, it makes little difference whether a branch, subsidiary or affiliated company is formed as long as the arrangement qualifies as an international organization for L-l purposes. International organizations are as follows.</p>
<p>Branch office in the US<br />
A branch office refers to the parent company registering itself to do business in the US, as opposed to forming a subsidiary or affiliate.</p>
<p>Subsidiary company<br />
A subsidiary for L visa purposes is a US company owned 50 per cent or more by a foreign corporation.</p>
<p>Affiliated company<br />
An affiliated company is a business linked by at least 50 per cent common ownership to the foreign parent. For L-l purposes the foreign parent must directly or indirectly control the US branch, subsidiary or affiliate. Control in this case generally means 50 per cent or more direct or indirect ownership.</p>
<p>A 50-50 joint venture between a foreign and American company may be an affiliate of the foreign company since the foreign company owns half of the US business. The joint venture could be a partnership between the US company and the foreign company&#8217;s wholly-owned US subsidiary. Or it could be a corporation owned half by US shareholders or companies, and half by the foreign company or its subsidiary. Many foreign companies transfer managers, executives or specialized knowledge persons to US joint-venture operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.regulators4access.ca/l-visas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Temporary Working Visas</title>
		<link>http://www.regulators4access.ca/temporary-working-visas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.regulators4access.ca/temporary-working-visas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 04:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1b visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embassies and consulates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enforcement policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governmental agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigrant visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international organizations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent residence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skill shortages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stepping stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treaties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uscis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visa category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work visas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Working]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working visa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working visas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.regulators4access.ca/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[International organizations and corporations use non-immigrant working visas to staff US operations. Investors use non-immigrant visas for themselves and employees sent to the US to monitor investments. US employers use non-immigrant visas to fill skill shortages in their companies. Many people use non-immigrant working visas as a stepping stone to permanent residence status and then [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>International organizations and corporations use non-immigrant working visas to staff US operations. Investors use non-immigrant visas for themselves and employees sent to the US to monitor investments. US employers use non-immigrant visas to fill skill shortages in their companies. Many people use non-immigrant working visas as a stepping stone to permanent residence status and then citizenship. People commonly obtain a non-immigrant work visa so that they can remain in the US while applying or waiting for a green card.</p>
<p>The US maintains two interdependent non-immigrant working visa systems. E visas are the product of treaties, negotiated between the US and other countries and administered by the Department of State through embassies and consulates. Congress created the other commonly used non-immigrant work visas H and L through domestic law. The USCIS serves as the lead agency for administering H and L visas or other visas created by domestic law.<br />
<span id="more-28"></span><br />
Most companies use a combination of E-1/2, H-1B, L-1A and L-1B visas to staff their US operations. The same person may qualify for an E visa category, or an H or L visa category. The combination of the H and L categories describes the same work activities as the E categories.</p>
<p>E visas include professionals, managers, executives and essential skill employees, whereas H and L include professionals, executives, managers and specialized knowledge employees. Differences in corporate ownership and organization, convenience, or the enforcement policies of the initial governmental agency you&#8217;ll be working with, the USCIS or Department of State, determine whether to apply for an E visa or an H or L visa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.regulators4access.ca/temporary-working-visas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

